...
2022-2023 Minutes Page, 2020-2021 Minutes Page, 2018-2019 Minutes Page, 2016-2017 Minutes Page, Pre-2016 Minutes Page
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
ATTENDEES: Wendy, Darren, Oliver, Dan, Flavio Web pages/ site plan Discussion:
ACTION: Darren will write to Jared Scientific Board Plan CV publication
Codebook outstanding issues Darren will look at these Presentation on DDI-L .v4.0BETA - who presents Future agenda: |
Expand | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Dan, Jeremy Web pages - General:
Products:
Document site:
ACTION ITEMS:
TC report to SB Update on current review work
Codebook (please look at before next week) DDICODE-93 License - more detailed values for type attribute
DDICODE-97 move license element to useStmt |
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Oliver, Dan, Jeremy, Flavio, Christophe, Olof Scientific Board Strategic Plan [note Flavio and Dan are elected members on the SB. Wendy is ex-officio] 1.4 W3C and explore - RDF representation preparation in 2024 - why would we want to give away the variable cascade to another organization 1.6 no date so when is this supposed to be worked on? non-open source like Colectica - what does it mean? The notion that we are working with commercial vendors and make no mention of those we currently work with. What exactly are we trying to develop? Work with related software (analysis tools) regarding input/output support? 2.2 we don't have an activity defined as such, what is in 2024? Clarify what this is mean here? architecture of content or of repository. Starting when? 2.3 addition of SDMX and HLG to this group specifically or as part of whole DDI interoperability. What do we mean by this in terms of organizational level? 2.4 The example is about domains not geographies but domain areas. Awkward, examples do not relate to geographies. 2.5 Progress toward ISO certification (we started, why is this 2025? What is meant by progress. More details - contact continuation, paperwork, GENERAL: of strategic plan to prioritize and focus work on specific areas. Concern there is too much for too many. Who is going to do this. 3.1 TC is working on in terms of organizing documents and publication 3.2 difference between 3.2 and 3.4? GENERAL: Verbiage is abstract making it difficult to differentiate and make sure that different aspects are identified as sub-bullets Omitted support of DDI Codebook 2.6 3.8 don't understand what this means (modularity within a product), but between products? Why is the example is a provenance model. Discussion on user mailing list (conceptual, and reference variable) was the actual issue we would face with 3.8. things differ between products and there are different implementations in various products. Need for metamodel to understand what is found in multiple products, but varying implementation. Example of metamodels (Groups). Need both metamodel to understand differences, and in some areas a single mullti-use content. Suggestions in the scientific model that haven't been discussed. They seem to be arising from a minimum number of sources "Let's do a provenance model" opens up a can of worms. No background discussion. There is a process raising topical rears and pursuing their development across products in one way or another. HOLES?: Lack of content regarding how to use DDI suite together. (maybe related to 2.6) maybe expand to include 2024? ACTION:
|
Expand | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Dan, Christophe, Jeremy Newsletter submission TC report to Scientific Board Glossary Group document publication DDI Lifecycle github issue Rather than think of the specific item raised here ACTION: Wendy enter this discussion on #38 (DONE); others should add comments on role of RepresentedVariable or other points as needed NEWS: |
...