Page Comparison

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Olof, Oliver, Flavio

• CDI till mid January

• Olov moved rest of materials to GitHub

• Beta review of DDI-L version 4 out next week

• Merged Olof's work on LinkML and will test that out

• File copied of documents on Beta review on Confluence site so they are easily aviable.

• Get this out next week for Beta review

• Send to: DDI-User List, Developers groups, DDI-SRG

• Oliver will catch up with Darren again when he is back from vacation (no issues, just follow-up)

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Jeremy, Olof, Oliver, Flavio, Christophe

• Review pull request for issues #12 and #19
  ​Language tagged strings and documentation, referencing subtypes of versionable by DanSmith · Pull Request #20 · ddialliance/ddimodel
  Walked through pull request process; validation, build outputs, see what exactly changed
  When pull request is added we can set required reviewers prior to merge
  ​Merge pull request #20 from DanSmith/master · ddialliance/ddimodel@486b43e

• Draft of DDI 4 beta release announcement
  Timing: Already working in Olof's repository (no restrictions) so need to find out when this can move. Two versions of OWL, straightforward, and with restrictions on domains
  restricted model says hasConcept can only be used on items variable and category (only place predicate can be use)
  Get feedback on both approaches in OWL (simple OWL - Olof; add in and put in build output)
  If we get done before the holidays we can get a release out.

Content: create a draft release on Github and create notes

Email draft: email content and draft of any additional information not in content documentation
Complete draft by next week and add to meeting agenda.

• Plan timing of DDI 4 beta release (next week?)
  Complete draft by next week and add to meeting agenda.
  Want full history on Bitbucket and clone to Git
  One repository per product
  CDI directly to github and remove bit bucket
  Production is not already pipeline on CV so that can be moved
  Oliver will double check with Darren if there are any transfer issues

• does anyone have any work that is not pushed
  Wendy will push to dditc

• If there is time I'd also like to review the infrastructure plan including, process for implementing, and timeline issues
  What does this mean for the timing of support of documents ion serving
  Neat to have this when the beta release went out
  Serving line documentation and high level documentation
  How is lifecycle updated (in terms of builds) - what are the options in terms of published documentation and documentation of new builds (need to provide access to both)
  <https://doc.ddialliance/<product>>/<version>where we always have:<https://doc.ddialliance/<product>>/masterto reflect the current state of master?

Jon will speak to Jared and make sure we have domain names for documentation
docs.ddialliance.org to point to the documentation server (DNS change handled by ICPSR/UMICH)

• Newsletter article
  Others will review. Jon will add info from today ad

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Jeremy, Oliver, Flavio

Roadmap document
-- get this done WENDY
EDDI TC meeting agenda
-- overall
Lifecycle get to the point where we can get something out to look at
--Schema changes, COGS stuff, and specific issues about objects
Codebook handfull of issues
CDI - what needs to get done
Controlled Vocabulary - what's left
Infrastructure needs piece

TC Organization paper
Two basic models
-- Bit of a problem with the product working groups reporting directly to the Scientific Board due to the workflow of product releases through the TC
-- The important thing is that the TC has a responsibility for the infrastructure
-- Autonomy of the working groups retained but clearer relationships [rationalize relationships]

RDF common set working group
Those who expressed interest have received draft of announcement. Please review so Dan can send out

IASSIST
No DDI meetings at IASSIST this year
No TC members have submitted presentations - please notify us if you do

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Jeremy, Flavio, Darren, Christophe, Oliver

Review of CDI processing

• Have a list people to contact - recheck with Arofan for any additions

• Time period is decided

• Need text for email

• Get issue filing information updated on site

• Updates from Flavio this week

• Generate packages and get to TC

• So still possible within November

• May be able to get out by EDDI with a 6 week review period

• OK on the approach for issue filing (Jon still needs to verify that general Atlassian login filing works - don't anticipate a problem)

PROPOSAL
On product page:

replace green box with section:

File an issue on this product
If you have an Atlassian account you can CLICK HERE to file an issue.
If you do not have an Atlassian account you can create a new account and then file an issue or use the DDI submission form HERE [link to the File and issue page]

File and issue page:

If you have an account with Atlassian click on the product below to file an issue.

If you do not have an account with Atlassian you can {create an account with Atlassian} [link to Atlassian site] then return to this page and file your issue.

Don't want to create an account? Use this Google Form to provide information on your issue and we will file it for you. You will be provided with the Jira issue number once it is filed so you can view comments and decisions on your issue as work progresses.

If you are not sure which product your issue relates to, file it on the Technical Committee issue tracker. We'll make sure it gets to the right project or projects.

DDI Codebook
DDI Lifecycle
DDI Cross Domain Integration (CDI)
Controlled Vocabularies
XKOS
SDTL
Technical Committee

New working group on RDF (Dan)
Working on announcement on new working group
Look for that in the next day or two

Codebook

• 3 Codebook items - send Darren a reminder of numbers

• Review process for Codebook entries - do remotely maybe hopefully PLEASE

CV releasing a new version resolving SKOS issues
Plan to get our system going on the 23 Nov
Oliver would be able to rerun at any time
Coordinating with them about any static information that needs to move over from DDI site

COSMOS - Admin Data workshop - has it been set?
Been difficult to nail down the meeting coordination
Flavio is in group that is coordinating meeting
Mon/Tues before is a time that CDI group would like to have meeting
Could be Mon/Tues after COSMOS

NEXT MEETING:
Roadmap document
Draft agenda for EDDI meeting/TC
Paper about ways in which working group could operate

No meeting in November after 16th; no meeting on December 28th

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Jeremy, Oliver, Christophe

Alternate Issue Submission form

​DDI ISSUE SUBMISSION FORM

Use as a back up as option for subject matter persons. This should be prominent on the pages. The zen desk at Colectica is also a good solution (internal user support). It is possible to bring this more to the foreground. Review ability to non DDI Jira members to file ASAP.

[Added noted 2023-11-08: Changed permissions to allow any Atlassian account holder to create issues. Identified page for information on creating an Atlassian account. ​Create an Atlassian account | Atlassian Support }

Codebook.
DDICODE-535
Item Adrian-4 #48
Would be difficult to define which format went with which file. If we want to provide multiple file descriptions. Everyone would have to add in the logic to figure out the relationship between the file format and the specific file description. The PDF codebook might contain more than one format but would always reference which of the file was being described (link between varFormat and physical file). These issues were why we created lifecycle. Need to be clear about purpose of codebook (1 datafile/dataset in a single format). varFormat provides additional information on the formating of the variable within a specific file.

How to describe multiple storage formats of a single study description/variable description. Add to Guide/Best Practices content.

DDICODE-534
see issue

DDICODE-537
see issue

Funding request to support IT infrastructure for development tools - maintenance, upgrade etc.
Does the RDF server fall under that? yes
Better description on what types of things would be covered, how tapping in or approval of funds would work. Opportunities for paying for some CI stuff for running serializations. For instance CI builds are running on Dan's personal account, but this should be moved to DDI github account.
Add to agenda for discussion at EDDI meeting.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Flavio, George

discussed DDICODE-536 and DDICODE-537 see comments in issues

Items for a process derivative products

canonical UML model
go to ​Library domain model UML class diagram example describes main library classes and relationships.

Derivative of the process we use "canonical UML"

Set up the review and publication process for these process derivative products
Cross DDI product toolkit for working with primary products:
DDI profiles
canonical UML
UCMIS
Transformation tools between products

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Olof, Jeremy, Flavio
Excused: Oliver, Christophe, Jon

Published Agenda

• Production pipeline (Oliver's pptx has been added to TC drafts folder (​PipelinesInDDIProduction.pptx

• I sent out the CDI Syntax representation document separately - we need to look at this and prepare for the syntax review (I believe there may have been some done at Dagstuhl and we need to take that into account

• Tool discussed at last weeks meeting (dependent upon Olof's availability)

CDI Syntax Representations

• The document provides the content needed for a technical review of the bindings

• Pretty clear on each of the steps

• UCMIS purpose and usage explained

• Updated package with small changes (cardinality, directionality, etc.) with updated change log

• Documentation update and model update - we should get this sometime in early November

• 2 months may be a reasonable to get back by mid-January

• Be ready when we receive it and can extend 2 weeks if needed

Question regarding use of other RDF vocabularies

• If we want to incorporate DC vocabulary etc that need to be moved back into the model

• For example we moved some data types back into the UML model

• The different syntaxes can have rules for how to pull these in (external namespace or DDI namespace)

• It's easier to annotate at the model level

• This question is the purpose of the new working group

• At least needs to be denoted in the model and manage the representation usages and relationships

• There were discussions regarding the acceptance or problems with use of external vocabularies

• The idea of a platform specific model comes back for individual syntaxes like OWL or JSON-LD (only for those that needed them)

• Has been under debate for some time and RDF group will discuss this. In the mean time this is how it is being done.

Codebook update

• Requirements for publication

• Process and tooling

• Oliver's production process slide

• Schema changes are being entered followed by documentation updates

• Adrian Dusa’s comments have been very helpful in identifying specific issues

Tool developed at Dagstuhl
​GitHub - ddialliance/ddi-cdi-sample-generator: JavaScript example application to generate ddi-cdi (json-ld)

• JSON-LD sample generator from CSV file using a view application

• Provides an interactive production of CDI

• Thought is that this should be expanded to Codebook and Lifecycle

• Work should be done in the Developers Group

• Aim for this is to show implementors how to implement

• Olof has written a proposal for a new tool for multiple products

• The NextDoor Publisher (Codebook, Lifecycle, CDI - export only)

• Hope to have an early version out in a few months

• What is needed for the sample generator and variable descriptions

• Ask to file documentation issues in product or TC JIRA

• Example implementation of CV in products

• How to use Codebook - will have a best practices so this can be used to capture this content

• ADD TO PAGES: Point at tool from each products. Would be a good tool when deciding

• This is great. It is something we have been missing for years

• For import Colectica basically does what NESSTAR supported plus whatever has been asked for

• There is a mapping on the Colectica page - it is a listed task for Colectica to get a complete mapping and this would be useful in NextDoor development

• There is an open issue tracker of things Olof and Oliver think need to be done. Add if needed with details.

​Issues · ddialliance/ddi-cdi-sample-generator
​NCCSV

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

• Including data in DDI - interesting question regarding a disconnect between data and metadata

  • Dan has submission of paper for COSMOS (not DDI specific)

  • Dataset in Lifecycle is not really used because it requires understanding of DDI to unlock the data

  • Using front matter on CSV with commented out JAMAL etc.

  • A good topic to discuss over drinks at EDDI

• Double check with Jon regarding TC presentation at EDDI - put on December agenda

• Next week no Dan or Jeremy

• Codebook updates next week

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Oliver, Christophe, Flavio, Jeremy, Dan

Detailed agenda and outcomes of TC meeting in Ljubljana

• Discuss options paper around work group organization - Focused discussion.

  • Where we are with Lifecycle - get it back on track

  • We have to still make the decision about embedding xhtml imbedded in schema

  • Update the converted lifecycle model to support extensions from privative types (value on class) - either not extend and make properties or change the tooling

  • FUTURE agenda item: change tooling or adjust model - this is a one time import

  • FUTURE agenda item: Dublin Core and XTML embedding in the specification - needs to be in consideration of multiple serializations (RDF, JSON, etc.)

  • Review of RDF specification - Pierre Antoine was going to add tickets (before or at meeting)

    • Property (source variable can only be used on a certain class)

• Goal is to get something that is ready to move in a level review for those outside of TC

• RDF group is getting started in the next few months so not much for the TC meeting

• Participants: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Jeremy, Darren, Olof, Christophe(?)

Update from Scientific Board Meeting

• sub-groups vs working groups for product development (when they should be sub-group or working group)

• Make this a future agenda item regarding this - between now and the TC meeting we get options and implications written down and then presented to SB

Update on CV stuff

• There has been some improvement by developers in Slovenia

• They changed something on the identification of concepts that now gives persistent non-language identifiers which means we no longer need to tweek the RDF and can just port it over. Leaving the transformation to codelist and html page

• Can probably wrap up in November (still a few bugs)

• Quite a lot of issues flagged in CV group itself - Darren should look at this to see if there is anything that we need to worry about

• From technical point of view, we should be able to put this up in 4-5 weeks

Production of CDI

• Talked to Achim about getting information about pipeline

• Diagrams of the workflow of different products (Lifecycle, Moving Forward, SDTL, CDI)

• CDI is manually moved through via Achim

• Can make possible upgrades by adding multiple access to EA and all should be able to extract the XMI and create a pipeline of the steps following that.

• Canonical XMI should be easy to pipeline. Acceleo requires a java library which would need editing at any changes. Sphinx could be pipelined

• Could pipeline some of this - main thing is to get this in a check-in check-out github approach

• Very few people usually editing in EA and they have to coordinate

• EA is not manageable through GIT

• Dif the XMI is technically possible but its a pain

• Has to be forbidden to check in different models of EA and XMI. Never a commit of just one of these files. They HAVE TO BE IN SYNC

• Diagrams are missing from this model - go into documentation

• ​CV Group Meeting Minutes

• Oliver can make these available for a discussion - including future pipeline and getting Achim to correct where needed

• Acceleo - main idea is that it is an eclipse plugin that can use a transformation description to create RDF, XSD, etc.

• To make this into a pipeline you need to surround transformation scripts with something that is possible to run headless

Tool from Dagstuhl

• Future agenda coordinate with Olof

ACTION: Firm up the draft road-map so that it clearer and makes prerequisites clear. Add to Face-to-Face TC meeting agenda

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Christophe

Scientific Board agenda

Has CV been contacted
​Scientific Board Working Group Contacts
Darren is contact

Training Group
Who needs to review what? TC does the technical review, what does the SB review or need to review? Structure of the training group and various sub-groups within the Training Group and how that should work.

Working group proposal on Data Capture (Questions and Questionnare work from Paris EDDI, Codebook interest in expressing questionnaire, provenance of data, etc.)
World Bank has expressed interest in a descriptive entry for questionnaire
Insee has a strong interest in this area - expressing specific technical features
Data capture in general

Roadmap
Indication of Lifecycle 4.0 would look like
Codebook change is it a possibility? Is it something that is really a profile of Lifecycle?
Boarder discussion of identification and versioning when it's required and what that means. Multiple serializations raise the question of what is a reference what is a structural relationship, versioning.

Next meeting agenda
Get a sense of what we are going to be doing in Lubjiana
Dan and Jeremy (?)
Wendy
Jon

ACTION: Common concepts and RDF - Dan will be submitting a plan for the working group and can include Christophe and Flavio as an initial member.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Jeremy

CDI update
Production information is being finalized by CDI group and should be delivered to TC in the next few weeks
TC needs to prepare for the review of the implementation formats for accurate rendition from UML XMI
Prior to vote CDI needs to prepare a presentation for voting members

XKOS Best Practices comprehension review
Still seems to be a problem with google to icpsr routing for DDI-SRG
Check out and inform Jared
Have Christophe resend
All TC members should review this document and comment as needed

CV resolution

Progress in URL production from CESSDA tool

Once all points resolved and verified, we can move forward on live resolution system

Keep moving on Codebook

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Flavio, Darren, Oliver, Jeremy
Excused: Jon

Roadmap development

Additional materials were added and a listing of practical steps added prior to meeting

​Roadmap Work Page

Regarding Practical Steps:

• Production tools - Codebook is there something we can do to support better automation of the process

• Make some notes on what documents contribute (StatsCan - example of what someone else is doing)

  • roadmap is kind of a GSIM view

  • Data Platform - remove

  • Metadata repositories (StatsCan)

ACTION: After completing changes noted above, send links to Darren and Hilde for SB

CV resolution system -

• In reading the GitHub issue dealing with URI correction - not clear if this will resolve the issue

• Oliver and Darren are looking at this (both will be in Dagstuhl to discuss)

• There are still issues, particularly in terms of language management which is different from the DDI approach

• Its a complex pipeline and much of our transformations address changing output from CESSDA - this could be a lot cleaner

• Continuing issue of internal communication and changes occurring without consideration of issues that it causes DDI

• It may be easier to pull out of the CESSDA CV manager

• TC needs to pull together a proposal concerning long-term support of CV manager

• It would be good to have the lifecycle codelist version (these are current products of our pipeline

• Oliver will send Dan example of codelist output to review - the following link provides access to all outputs of the pipeline that transforms CESSDA output

​ddi-alliance/ddi-cv

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Dan, Flavio, Christophe, Jeremy

XKOS Best Practice paper comprehension review

Note that XKOS is the first document to go through the technical document review process and is being used to sort out the details
Document is located at:
link-statitics.github.io/skos/skos-best-practices.htl#bp-labels

Comprehension review:

• Intended audience - the question raised in a comprehension review is whether the intended audience understands what is being covered and the intended guidance

• Review process - need to identify intended audience, length of review period, how comments are collected (these will vary with the document)

• Announcement of publication

  • WHO: DDI and others known user groups

  • WHAT: Description of coverage should be in the announcement
    [notes interrupted due to technical difficulty. connection reestablished during a discussion of some questions the TC members had regarding use of time stamp vs. version number]

  • Date stamp only for Best Practice, no version

  • The Technical review was done earlier

  • The comprehension review should address the following

  • Clear what is covered and what is not

  • Are the options and recommendations clear

Audience for review: NSI group, EUROSTAT working group, general DDI Users as a broad pass
Some stats can people will be interested

A few questions were raised based on a quick skim the document

• major revisions of classification

• major versions with new URIs

• proposed URI patterns - a proposal or recommendation (we recommend because...)

• more text around why

• Primarily it was an issue of making sure that users would understand why an approach was recommended as well as what was recommended

ACTION: Have TC members read through and note any issues

Capturing comments:

• How to respond - filing in github is the best way to respond

• Will have a meeting in a few weeks with the European working group for suggestions and ask for some feedback on how short/long it should be

EDDI session proposal
Turn into a presentation - Wendy

Roadmap
The Scientific Board has asked for a draft or whatever the current stage of this work is prior to the in-person Scientific Board Meeting in early October
Steps:

• Last road-map document

• What we captured last August 2022

• Go through past minutes

• Draft - pull it together

• Chur - document

• Put on agenda for next week

Concept/ConceptualText/Controlled Vocabularies used
next week

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Oliver
REGRETS: Dan, Flavio

EDDI 2023 session proposal
Need to add specific presenters/titles/short statement
See document: ​EDDI 2023 Proposals

Codebook: Concept/ConceptualText
Suggestion to keep these separate where concept adds all of the specific URL/URN links and a place for the "code". This way the label can go in the textual content of concept (all locations need to be repeatable) and the text portion of the conceptual text retains it role of containing general text related to the parent tag. This was original a means of being able to add specific concepts to large textual pieces rather than use of the text portion to provide labels or description of a concept.

Need a guidence document on this that also pulls in CESSDA discussions and SKOS provisions. Focus on backward compatibility, ease of identifying labels (as opposed to broader descriptive text), and clear transfer of information between Codebook, Lifecycle, CDI, XKOS, CVs, etc.
https://github.com/cessda/cessda.metadata.profiles/blob/main/CDC_2.5_PROFILE/cdc25_profile.xml line 980 for example
ACTION: Wendy will write up and Darren will review and edit

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

• Jon submitted the proposal for a TC side meeting at EDDI (number 28)

• Darren will let TC know if there is any material they need to prepare for the in-person Scientific Board meeting in early October (following next week’s SB meeting)

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Jeremy, Flavio, Oliver

RDF Union Model Working Group:

• Dan will be sending out an email to user list asking about interest for new proposed working group on RDF

• Do we need a separate official work group for this or just a sub-set of the TC

• Easier to bring other people into from the outside

• Does it have more of a life if its a formal committee

• Relatively informal thing and if it gets legs then think about setting up a group

• Dan will write up and we'll start with it informally

General comments on working groups and coordination:

• TC's role is clear but needs to be clearly publicized

• Is it helpful to have all these working groups (product and topical) if we can't keep them coordinated

• Topical groups in terms of new coverage

• Silo's of products

• New content coming out of product groups can cause issues when coordinating across groups

• Groups need to have a roadmap for what they are doing and where they are going

• New areas need to be exposed to others

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, George, Oliver, Jeremy, Flavio, Christophe

Dan's email regarding RDF union model

Issues:

• Is there enough commonality between -yes by intent and at a higher level Concept-->Specialized Concept-->Specific content

• A more finite set then what Flavio and Wendy are looking at

• Common representation at at least a specific level

• How atomic objects are put together (similarity/differences)

• What content is transferable what is specific to a product due to its use

• Is there a role for Disco in this - implications in terms of Disco as a published product

• Really requires a separate working group - need to refine the focus

  • RDF (initial but not sole outcome)

  • Harmonization/higher level model for DDI

  • It makes sense to have a dedicated group - task group but could continue as an ongoing support product

  • Define ties to TC as the product coordination group

  • Need people who are familiar with all of the different products - Codebook, Lifecycle, CDI, etc.

ACTION:

• Draft new working group description - Dan will write a draft (Wendy will point to documents describing what is needed)

• Can we do a combination so that there is some short term payoffs and then look with more time - how much is TC still doing and feed this into this group

• Charge should focus on finding commonalities and objects that are and can be shared among the products
  Group shouldn't start out looking at ontologies but at commonalities

• How the group is populated

Overall goals for DDI Suite integration/interplay:

• Move for products to have more common ontology/common objects

• This could be a new core to align products

• Facilitate the movement of content between products (working group would support) - product specific content

• More consistency in future

Principals - clarify

• Coping and handling various content problems (ICPSR, CESSDA, WorldBank, etc.)

• Extending or surrounding - what gets covered by which parts of the suite

• Need for tooling for: decision support, content transformation (to consume content and transfer), other?

• What working groups would support (new group) - comparability from top to bottom

• Jon's experience in Codebook to Lifecycle transfer - what are the problems, how do we develop the products in a way that ease this problem

• For the last decade DDI has lived in this dualistic universe which had a tense relationship and now are becoming trinitarians with CDI. Need a credo that states there is a DDI reality underlying this and needs to be viewed as part of a broader whole.

• This session should probably be written up as an article for IQ

• Post meeting discussion between chair and vice-chair regarding implications for TC role in DDI:

• Roadmaps for each product - what we want to do, how does it align with other products?, should it be in more products?

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Jeremy, Oliver, Flavio, Dan

Lifecycle 4.0 preparation

Start with the Bugs and move to the improvements
Add column E information comments to Jira issues. Jon will start looking at the bugs.

Presentations for EDDI

• Update from TC - slot which can cover what we need it to

• Could do something on (training or session) Codebook 2.6 or CDI

• Common ground of products - Flavio and Wendy / presentation preparation - session rather than presentation

  • granularity

  • applications needed to support

  • implication for movement between others

  • Referencing from DDI and other products

  • Classification areas

TC meeting

• We need to have very specific outcomes.

• The people we need are the people around the technical committee

• Olof should be invited

• Flavio reviewing the UMI (XMI output)

• RDF tasks - making the URIs for types of items across products (non-product specific) not planned for a time so we need to look at when this can go on the schedule (main item types only). Flavio/Wendy model work can feed into this in terms of identifying common elements. We can get clearer on this as we go along.

• Are there validation implications between different syntaxes (XML, RDF, Json, UML/XMI, etc.). Implications for use, provide shape to various scenarios.

• Check back in during September to see where we are and make we keep tightening this up.

Future meetings

Codebook work primary topic for August
Cancel next week due to attendance

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Jeremy, Oliver

AGENDA

• Update on CDI work and technical review work

• TC meeting - in context of EDDI

• Codebook work - remaining few issues, comments from Darren if available

• August/September/October work schedule

CDI

CDI draft of materials they have pulled together regarding process looks like it is covering everything we've asked for

End of August is the earliest we will get this due to vacations etc. This works well for setting up technical review. We should be ready to go with this soon after we receive information from CDI.

ACTION:

Email Arofan with one added item for common approaches (use of External Controlled Vocabularies) as well as the goal to outline parameters of technical review before we receive final materials.

EDDI - TC meeting

• TC Meeting - agenda

• Pick up areas where there were issues where remodeling

• Were the decisions we made workable

ACTION:
Jon and Wendy will start drafting the agenda for the meeting and we can refine as we go along

Activities from Aug-Nov:

• Dan COGS stuff in August/September

• Go over outstanding LIFECYCLE issues for inclusion in 4.0 and getting that work done
  ​4.0 and 4.1 applicable issues

• Codebook - Schedule time ASAP August/September

• Getting schema changes done in August - September finalizing documentation and process info

• Flavio and Wendy - models

• Drafting out when and how to roll out separate lifecycle and codebook groups and then what TC looks like after

• RDF work that came out of EDDI last year - look at this after next weeks review of 4.0 issues

ACTION:
Send Jon content for Codebook high level documentation

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Jeremy, Oliver, Darren

DDI Codebook 93, 95, 97 - reviewed (see JIRA issues for comments)
All issues were agreed on in general and only specific need to be determined (exactly how changes will be entered)
Darren will look at details and provide comments on how to enter

Lifecycle 4.0
Review of issues to identify which could/should be made it 4.0 especially due to required structural changes
Review of subsitution groups and other obscure XML structures
Test for round tripping between 3.6 and 4.0

ISI World Statistical Conference
ISP session on DDI 20 year cooperation with Statistical Agencies
When presentations published I'll provide links to DDI world

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Flavio, Christophe

CDI

New XML examples
Cardinality issues for wide (having to have at least one data point)
review to see if there are

List of consistent items requiring comment:

• Identification

• Referencing

• Sequencing

• External Controlled Vocabulary usage

• Ability to run the script (UCmss)

• Templates included in a repository link

• Run in Eclipse add-in (open source tool)

• Mapping of serializations -

• Why the ontology's were selected (other RDF languages)

First impression:

• All properties are unique per class but can make querying the model is more difficult. (why was this decision made)

• The domains of each property are unique

• No mention of cardinalities in the OWL (this is available in OWL)

• Not putting cardinality in but putting in a SHAQL or SHECKL

• Question about cardinality of identifiers

• ACTION: Dan will write up a list of comments or questions regarding sparql query language is pretty powerful. Serialization is written in such a way that makes this difficult to use.

• Consistent property names in past version

Codebook Status
ACTION: Review for change to resolved status

Lifecycle
Milestones - 4.0 (structural change)
Milestone - 4.1 (content updates)
ACTION: Review open issues (fixes that can to in 4.0; what needs to wait; what requires long-term discussion)

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Oliver, Christophe

Focused Technical Review for CDI representations

Reviewer Suggestions:

Olof Olson JSON-LD (all is the request)
Franck Cotton (turtle)
Oliver Hopt
Benjamin Zepilko
FORS guys nudge specifically (from developers group)
Deirdra Lungley
Sam Spencer
[Christophe and Jon will check with a few within their organizations]

Label to use for issues filed in DDICDI: TC_review_v1.0_rc1

Codebook 2.6 - need to get this moving again and finished up; there is immediate demand for this work to be completed
ACTION: Wendy will go through and create a list of exactly what needs to be completed and provide to Jon and others that can help with completing this

Christophe raised a question:
How do we create a mapping between concepts using Lifecycle, CDI others

Current options:

• Correspondence table - simple mapping, makes use of controlled vocabularies

• Array concept - create a concept broader/narrower exact/similar, subclass or reference

• XKOS - probably best equipped area

• Statistical Classification - check that out

ACTION: Christophe will look at current options and then file a TC issue that can be looked at across products in terms of further development

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Christophe, Oliver, Flavio, Jeremy

Scientific Board - please provide Jared with any recommendations for the open position in the Scientific Board. Please verify that the person you identify is insterested.

CDI review

The materials to be included in the review are all in the DDI-CDI repository:  ​ddi-alliance/ddi-cdi

Assumption: CDI will fix known bugs prior to publication vote, requires a new package version. The time involved with having the technical review of the production process provides time for fixing known bugs and any reported during review.

Timeline

• June-July get out for technical review of production process

• Provide 2-3 weeks plus taking us probably through August

• CDI needs to provide a revised packaged based on bug ccorrection and review

Types of questions to consider:

• Use of propriatary file structures. (md, spss.sav, EA, docx, xlsx, etc.) Should these be changed to non-proprietary or instructions provided for general access)

• Diagrams are in EA - folder of diagrams (many in documentation so people don't have to go into EA

• SPSS.sav could this be a set-up file with database if required

• Which documents should be in the package and which should be treated as separately versioned support documents

Review interests

• XML Schema and XMI - Oliver, Wendy

• Production process - Jeremy, Wendy, Oliver, et al

• json-ld ontology - Dan, Christophe, Flavio (ask Ben Z.)

• field-level - Jon, Oliver, Wendy

• High-level - Jon, Wendy, Flavio
  second half may be weaker than first half

Directions for commenting

• Where should we make notes issues and questions?

• Specific issues in JIRA tracker - Use existing CDI tracker with labels TCReview, other one for public review

• List of questions/comments we can go over - google sheet within our folder
  ​CDI Review by TC

Limited availability over summer:
Oliver - July 1 - 18
Flavio/Wendy - ISI July 16-20
Jon July 1-24
Christophe 2 week in July and one in August
Dan won't be at TC Septemberr 28

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Jeremy, Flavio

Issues from CDI group - this could be changed prior to publication for vote
--Relaxing cardinalities in the areas of dataPoints
--Key contents
--system requirements (will be in data files but not during process)
--Understanding XML examples regarding documentation
--what put out immediately to support spec - explaining the examples more fully
--Examples still need to be passed over to TC

Topic piece for TC meeting

Probably at EDDI Slovenia 27-29 Nov (M-W, add a Th-F)
Space at MPC - as an option (talk to Cathy)

Two to three day
Flavio not sure but would need funding - Minneapolis is easier

Review of specification:

• Complete except UCMIS component tooling - reinforce that this needs to be passed on
  Documentation references this document so this implies this needs to be released at the same time
  Need for additional review - there are now 2 RDF syntaxes are completely new and XML is created with a new tool
  --serializations are now changed or are new
  --specific technical review for alignments and model representation, style of generated OWL etc
  --we don't know the amount of review of this - ask Arofan who has reviewed these outside of CDI that have reviewed
  Would also allow them to change cardinalities prior to vote
  Check documentation for explaination of role of CDI

• What has been changed more recently is the process part and should be looked at by the TC more closely, this has not been used as much as the rest

• If there is a review period for serialization, it would be good to have notes available prior to that
  --UML-normalized
  --Normalized to OWL etc
  Documentation of why and how - completing whats mentioned in the notes
  There is more to review in auto-serialization process (consistency, coverage, etc.)
  Track how we set this up for future reviews
  --suggest specific people
  --future reviews for this or other products (first serialization situations, second serializations)

Areas of review focus by members:
Jeremy in the next 2 week - XML serialization and production
Flavio - production process, whole stack to see everything is in place

Additional items of note

• Reminder of Dagstuhl invitation for interest in attending
  Interoperability workshop more open initiation

• Once new version of Lifecycle is out we want to look at the physical description for simplification and broader coverage, NCubes, dataset reference metadata can be easily transferred back and forth. First stuff after production. Good topic for content meeting in next fiscal year requests

ACTION ITEMS:

• Send request to TC members regarding review of French language versions of training slides

• Inform Arofan of interest in a techncial review of serializations and auto-generation processes. Who has reviewed these to date? When will the UCMIS be available?

• Send request to TC members regarding internal review of DDI-CDI package: initial questions, aspects they would individually like to look at.

• Reminder of the Dagstuhl invitation for interest

Due to individual conflicts on 05-25 and IASSIST 06-01

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan
REGRETS: Flavio

1 Membership updates
Genevieve will be leaving TC due to change in position
Ask members to each suggest one person
2 Presentation at Annual Meeting
focus is on future focuses (see ppt) reviewed approach of stating goals followed by specific areas of work
3 Schedule of expected activities through mid-September
CDI
Codebook
SDTL - Talk to George in June about version 2
Lifecycle - COGS (Dan will be working on remaining issues)
Any on-going individual work (web pages, broad modeling)

4 Administrative
Summer scheduling availability:
Jon - gone most of June
Wendy/Flavio - out July 16-20 for ISI

Cancel next 2 weeks meeting (May 25 and June 1)
Members will be notified when CDI hands over package materials so they can start looking at them independently

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Oliver, Flavio, Dan

CV update
Several issues have been resolved at CESSDA
Remaning should be resolved at meeting
ERlang (Erikson created)
Concept URIs is all that is left to fix
This should allow for test system roll-out right after Annual meeting
May 24th meeting - roll out test and work out production run

DDI Annual Meeting

Future focus:

• Technical production alignment

• Benefit of production lines is to open up development to a broader group (goals of COGS)

• Production costs

• Profile mechanisms as a stand alone product week

• Alignment of individual products in terms of overall coverage of DDI

Jira issue
Question: which of those trackers need to be public

• Reasonable to have them readable public - all

• Standards need to be able to file issues - we can't put them all on Atlassian

  • It's a low frequency of filing except when doing reviews

  • Many want to file issues, but can't do reasonable issues - too granular or too boad

  • Duplication of issues or variations on a theme

• Single filing system - outside of Jira with a moderator/triage system

• General lack of interest in posting but its an administrative thing

• If we want to archive we can turn off public viewing

• Products want to retain public review making that viewable

• When someone is submitting something make sure they are notified if action takes place

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Oliver, Dan, Flavio
Regrets: Genevieve

Exec Meeting (from Jon)
Funding proposal accepted for funding

CDI update
Moving on schedule. Package to TC will contain all the items we requested including versionable package, informational pieces, and production process information
Note that all product groups will be asked for this set of information for future publications starting with Codebook

Follow-up on discussion with Daryl last week
Daryl got on both DDI-Users and DDI-SRG lists in DDI and has posted a note to those lists
He has also joined IASSIST and will be posting there also
Achim responded with additional information. I will follow-up as will Gabriel.
Mathais is still on sick leave but Oliver will ask him to just send Daryl a note that he is interested but unable to be involved for the next few weeks.

TC report at the annual meeting
We haven't officially gotten our request from Ingo
Added Christophe to the member list. Don't see need for other changes
I will talk to Ingo and Darren about any speaking time for TC. Is it needed? It would be short.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Oliver, Flavio
REGRETS: Darren, Genevieve, Dan
Guests: Daryl Hebting, Gabriel Gellner

Developers Group relationship with TC

• Main thing is to make sure there is close connection through a monthly meeting with Wendy, Oliver, Ingo, and SB contact

• There is a need to ping-pong between needs for tool development from TC regarding production or user support and the interests of individuals in the group

• What could be accomplished in tool implementation? The current situation, nobody sees a real chance to create any large tools because no one has an actual ticket for large amounts of their time

• They have an interest to invest what time they have - concept providing, productivity tooling

• Production ready tooling would require funding - Developers group could provide good sets of requirements

• Plans for next Hackathon are underway (probably in Koeln)

• There will be a report for Philadelphia meeting and a textual report

• Oliver is covering the confluence site so this would be a good place to make clear what is being worked on, how to bring up tool requests

• Good to hear its started and looking forward to great things

• Good to have communications a priority

Alliance web pages - current changes and future options

• If we have less functionality - we can look at what we want and make the proposal to Jared at a later date

• Option would be to pay for added functionality or move it off-site ala CV pages

• Need to coordinate this with Olof for the Tools page

Guest at half past the hour Daryl Hepting - Disco interest
Daryl Hepting - University of Regina
Publishing linked-open-data
Need for a universal linked information system
Looking at usability process of publishing data for citizens who have data
Making survey data from student survey available to permit analysis
Feedback has been collected on paper
Used a Jekyll website with open-ended into a YAML file
Now have output CSV that could be generalized to use in SHACL
Mapping to RDF
OpenRefin
RMLMapper, YARRRL
SCVW annotiating CSV files with separate metadata file with conversion to RDF via templates
Used Disco to define variables in CSV file
disco:LogicalDataSet link
Interested in use of Disco
Particular interest in capturing study and group level relationships
How does Disco facilitate links between this and other vocabularies for the description and access to small data sets
This may have application as and entry profile to DDI via RDF - we have always looks for ways of expanding into student and individual researchers users

ACTION:

• Send Daryl information on DDI Users list and IASSIST

• Daryl will post on DDI Users and IASSIST (through Wendy) for other interested in application of Disco and his survey interest

• Clean up Disco content (broken links and date issue) - Wendy

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Flavio, Dan, Oliver, Christophe, Jon
REGRETS: Darren, Genevieve

Controlled Vocabulary

• CVs: issue with CESSDA output has been formally filed and Darren is following up.

• Issues filed, there was duplication of languages, and there is the issue of the URNs

• Duplication seems to be an issue of UA vs Rest API which results in the dup language

Activity updates

• CDI is keeping up with there production schedule so we can expect that prior to annual meeting.

• I am getting past family commitments and will get back to Codebook

• We continue discussions with the person interested in Disco. We need to set up a call with him and I need to know who to include from TC or elsewhere. [Discission point]
  Jon, Darren, Matthäus Zloch matthaeus.zloch@gesis.org (see document for spelling), Flavio (will check with Gabriel Gellner), Christophe

2024-25 work priorities (google doc version for future work ​2024-25 work priorities )

• Production process alignments, fixes and revisions

• Lifecycle and CDI will have issues along their production processes - bug fixes improvements

• What are the requirements / use cases for the DDI Suite? Scoping, aligning scope with use cases and requirements, how do we track, discuss, and prioritize in a more organized formal matter

• Paris meeting - RDF/OWL ontology that links together different products at the item type level (how does this dovetail or is a publication of content from the database)

• Expansion of instrument to describe a tool that can be used outside of questionnaire data collection - Use of current content and the limitations of how the item is described - review of questionnaire and data capture

COGS I need actions here. This was a priority for this year and we seem to be stalled. How do we fix this?

• Outputs are there right now

• Review COGS tooling list of things that need to be updated (incorporating Dublin Core into it) - Dan will be working on end of June through summer to customize Lifecycle usage

• Start looking at output again

• Jon has a project at the UKDA at writing some python classes out from COGS model

• Conversion process form Lifecycle schema to COGS model we inherited from primitive data types - Dan will be adding a check to COGS to not allow that (example: CV inheriting from xs:string means we are missing string value in Json etc)

• When making SDTL in COGS we were not dealing with the conversion process and so this is improving conversion rules

Other issues? See DDILIFE-3713

• Incorporation of DC into model? Is it worthwhile incorporating an outside schema into
  Include Olof on this topic

• Do we want to be pulling this into the xml serialization through our own storage in xml or to reuse

• External dependency adds some extra work - this needs to work across different implimentatons

• Maybe a meeting at IASSIST - find out who will be there via a poll on the SRG list

• Are the other major areas we should be looking at? Christophe are the issues from Insee?

ATTENDEES: Jon, Oliver, Darren
REGRETS: Wendy, Flavio, Christophe

TC Funding submission

Submitted document at: ​Funding Request 2023-24

DDI-CDI progress

Using http for Document being finalised to come to TC.

Controlled Vocabularies

Duplicates issue has been raised on GitHub, still investigating where the issue was / why and how this is occurring. Other issue is lack of persistent identifiers being produced from CESSDA. Discussion with CESSDA to look at a plan going forward.

DDI-Life 3512 - for next weeks agenda

Website functionality - for next weeks agenda

Functionality we'd like to have to storing metadata on and providing search and access to examples, tools, profiles, and relationships to other standards

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Flavio, Darren, Genevieve, Christophe, Dan
REGRETS: Jon

Introduction of new member

Christophe Dziowski (Insee)
Areas of interest:

• Lifecycle work

• Planning to look at CDI for data description

• Large consumer of DDI objects

• Issues arise that they'd like to discuss

• Other questions as they arise

CV resolution update

• CESSDA output dup label/discussion language entries

• Darren will be meeting with CESSDA next week

• Put on 2024-25 workplan review of CV output, CESSDA relationship, options

• Send a note to CV group

Postman collection for test RDF system:
​DDI Alliance Controlled Vocabularies

Funding

• Some questions were raised about cost representations

• Face-to-Face and Administrative data group requests are priorities

ACTION: Wendy will complete and send out for any additional comments and then turn in on April 10

Face-to-face

• Discussed content coverage

• Long-term work infrastructure and DDI Suite management

Administrative data

Need to clarify a couple of points in cost estimate with Jon
​COSMOS
Infrastructure support

Approved within group

Does not address infrastructure development work. Focuses on maintenance/bug issues. Any long term needs for standard maintenance or infrastructure (cloud space for example) should eventually become a standard budget item not a yearly request

DDILIFE-3512

Dan will provide example of how to handle use of UserAttributePair of identifiable parent object with multiple CodeValueTypes. Add to a future agenda for review

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Flavio, Jon, Darren, Oliver

Location of updated SKOS output for CVs (Wendy will add object structures to database of DDI products)
​ddi-alliance/ddi-cv

Funding Discussion:
Wendy and Jon will pull together specifics of the identified funding areas
​Funding Request 2023-24

DISCO discussion:
​Disco Discussion
Next steps:
Help facilitate Daryl's use of Disco
Set up a discussion with him
Clean up html and content of disco pages - date on html page is wonky
Clean up broken links RDF XML and N-triples
​DDI-RDF Discovery Vocabulary

CESSDA and CV update:

URI's in CESSDA output have been updated (not totally right - still human readable - but not a problem for us
Oliver has run a new refresh cycle so bitbucket repo contains 3 digit numbers (doesn't have same URI's)
Just added an extra field that allows going back from codelist to RDF

CESSDA is migrating from bitbucket to GitHub which will cause some issues
So source location will change
Should not effect our process as our bitbucket is under our control

During meetings in CESSDA after 28th April we can move on this then (based on Darren's availability)

The URI's generated on our side will remain constant over time

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Genevieve, Oliver, Dan

REGRETS: Flavio, Jon, Darren

Scientific Board Issues

TC reviewed the issues from the Scientific Board 2023 extension of their workplan. The goals was to identify what materials we needed to pull together to support further work by the Scientific Board. We also considered the timelines for these issues so that we can add them to our 2023 workplan. See the Google Doc in the TC Drafts folder:

​Scientific Board Goals Requiring TC Input

DDICODE-101

We reviewed the additional comments from Taina and Sanda on this issue. See the Jira issue for additional discussion. We have proposed a solution which will be fleshed out in the next few days for review. Note that this solution attempts to balance the intent of concept and conceptualText, the needs noted by the filers, and the need for consistency over the versions of Codebook.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Oliver, Dan, Darren
REGRETS: Genevieve, Flavio

Update on CDI work schedule - shared draft from CDI

DDICODEBOOK see issues for discussion, comment, and resolutions where decided
DDICODE-100
DDICODE-88
DDICODE-94
DDICODE-95

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Darren, Dan, Genevieve, Flavio
REGRETS: Jon

Codebook issues - some specific questions and also how you want to deal with non-response to questions we've asked filers
Updated resolutions to
DDICODE-92
DDICODE-96
DDICODE-91

LIFECYCLE Controlled Vocabulary alignment with Codebook
--Can we fast-track the addition of controlledVocabularyInstanceURN to ControlledVocabulary
--Write up issue and let TC know this is filed. Alternatively provide a consistent extension (KeyValuePair) approach until the next version when it will be added as XXX

Status of CV system - further discussions with CESSDA and our next steps in terms of reporting status and any action we want from SB
--Problem with URLs in SKOS
--They need to run a recreate task, after they remembered they regenerated
--Still saying NULL on the production system; test system is OK
--IDs in URI - are they going to be generating IDs and 3 digit versions (NO and YES) - Oliver handles IDs post production
--Miles will be leaving
--Darren will talk to Carsten about when this will be deployed
--Progress is slow
--Need to get them to publish the correct URIs
--Will be switching from Bitbucket to Github
--Darren is following up with Carsten about who is handling this when he leaves; can we expedite deployment
--We have to document this work so that there is a communication channel between CESSDA and TC as we are dependent upon that
--We both seem to be interested in formalizing this contact so we should take advantage of the timing
--Darren will continue to pursue
--Need to get informed about every deployment on production system in advance so we could test against our system

New issues with DDI Alliance web pages and future changes in Drupal and page options
--Loss of data base options for tools, examples, etc.
--write up what we do use and how those features work
--send to Oliver and Olof for recommendation
--Might want to do similar to what we did with CVs in bringing off-site to a content management system

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Genevieve, Dan

REGRETS: Jon, Flavio

Discussed Marketing Group role per request from Jared. Notes located at

​Marketing Group recommendations from TC

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Oliver, Flavio
REGRETS: Genevieve

Clarification of TC check list for product review prior to publication

• Start with the old document of what should be in a public review

• Add info on license

• Something done in August and earlier version sent ot Arofan

• Bring that information together, clean it up, post it, inform product groups

ACTION:

• Wendy will locate previous documents and discussions

• Jon will pull this together into an informative document that can be published and shared with product groups

SB-12

• What is the scope

• Meta deliverable - there needs to be a general product lifecycle methodology

• Are we going to include a testing methodology

Recommended:

• Move to TC

• Development work is done within a working group

• Detailed thing makes no sense

• Identifying things that are done centrally (licensing, maintenance

• Clarify the script - management of requirements

• How to deal with new requirements - high level is in procedures document, does this need more details or a means of tracking cross product expanded coverage

• Capturing requirements - parallel implementation in other products - this needs to be fleshed out

ACTION: Darren will work on wording based on this discussion

Codebook issues needing comment from Katja and Sanda have gone out (5 issues)

Postman promotion of DDI Controlled Vocabularies and other content

• ​DDI Alliance Controlled Vocabularies
  and documentation is at ​DDI Controlled Vocabularies (CVs)

• Currently done under Darren's account with Pascal

• Make this more a formal connection API

• If this is a worthwhile activity then we could make this more formal

• Oliver does not use but others do

• Is their an intent to use GraphUL? Pascal is enthused to devote some time to this

• We could develop tidier URL to this and promote more

• This is a more developer friendly resource

• It is a supplimental piece not a replacement

• "Augmenting the value chain of DDI"

• If it could be formalized and promoted it could be more relevence

• This should have a designated TC contact (Darren)

• This may not be a TC decision per se should make recommendation to SB

• There is the sustainability issue

TO DO:

• Follow up on a call with Pascal and then follow-up with the SB

• Explain the value of adding this approach

ACTION: Darren will prepare something for the next SB

CV work:

• The SKOS is full of null's for all of the URI

• They have changed the way their REST service responses

• Oliver needs to do a few edits to the process to handle all the null entries

• ADP was supposed to come along and sort this out and its now way worse

• TC issue here is that it stops our work - they changed the output

• Is there a validation system for this -- NO

• The URLs used to be valid within just one document

• We may just need to take the CVs out of CESSDA

• We would need to provide a replacement for the entry work

ACTION:

• Darren will write up a report of the blockade to our work

• Need to have some form of assuance from CESSDA that they are continuing in their committiment (to Bonnie, member rep) with Carsten leaving - written request from Hilde as Chair of SB, Darren will include this request in his report

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan, Darren, Oliver, Genevieve
EXCUSED: Flavio

DDI Alliance web pages (Products section)

Ideally we should be able to generate a landing page for CVs

Don't understand where we currently are on the Drupal
ACTION: Obtain information on version used and determine options

GOALS:

• Simple navigation - very wordy (comments on current situation)
  --Product page with 6 or seven different products (Overview page)
  --Overview of Current Products is heavily wordy - need to review and modify
  --Individual pages need to be revised - separate issue see action items

• The normal approach for software or standards is to go to the current version

• Deprecate the old page and redirect the generic URL to go to the current version

• Landing on DDIalliance.org/Specification --> overview page

• individual headers (sans) version should go to current version of the product

• configuration of redirects to current versions - need to specify this information

• The problem with the old specification page is that it is retrieved by true Google

• Redirect to a location mentioning old page is deprecated and Google will learn new URL over a six month period

How does DDI manages old content? Is there a process?

ACTION: Create a set of redirects that we want

ACTION: Darren will send suggestion for product page structures

ACTION: Oliver will look into Drupal capabilities

DDICODE-101

• Concept to provide a home for the label in multiple languages?

• When the vocab stuff was added

• Documentation needs to be added to

• A number of these provide only the token or code which is single

• Add an attribute for a code value/token

• ContentType is an extension of Simple Text.

• Several locations Content used directly.

ACTION: Get back to filers and find out exactly what they want to express and review solutions

DDICODE-95
ACTION: find out where are you using ExtLinks/Links

DDICODE-90/91
RESOLVED: Add access attribute specifically as noted IDREFS (sdaterefs is still available broadly)

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Jon, Oliver, Genevieve, Darren

DDICODE-101

Notes are on the issue. We discussed both the request, the desired usability based on the request, and software issues. Darren and Dan will go through carefully. This will probably need a meeting with Katja and Taina to resolve.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Oliver, Genevieve

Went through SB draft of 2023 workplan and added comments in time for SB meeting on 2023-01-17

Reviewed number of Codebook issues that were outstanding. Resolving or identifying where more information was needed see Jira with filter Codebook-Outstanding

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Flavio, Dan, Genevieve, Oliver

Reviewed document of SB work plan making notes regarding updates and requests for more clarity
Review Jon's comments on google doc
Get to SB prior to Jan 17th meeting

Jon will draft the report form so we can respond and get in by due date to SB

COGS still has a couple tickets left
the main issue for XML validation: ticket 292 DC namespace issue
deciding how xml:lang should be mapped - move to xml:lang tag when its talking about the overall language of the content

In JSON we are treating this as a property
In RDF there is no xml:lang and so we need to address this

Could be done after conversion so we are not doing a lot of editing.

Dan will look at what needs to be done and when they can fit it in

CODEBOOK
Try and complete that in January.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Flavio, Dan, Oliver

Reviewed the notes from the Integration Languages workshop

ACTIONS:

• Post notes as confluence pages (done)

• Draft content for database of DDI objects by product based on decisions on Common Objects page

• Finalize the description of the RDF URL decisions from the meeting and verify with ICPSR on needed redirects

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Flavio, Oliver, Dan, Darren

NOTE: No meeting until December 8 due to US holiday and EDDI

AGENDA: Carry over from last week
See minutes from 2022-11-10 for RDF URI document

ACTION: Darren will make the changes noted and contact Achim and Pierre-Antoine

Recommended sub-agencies:

initials are consistent with past identification as DDI-L, DDI-C, and DDI-CDI

• Lifecycle: int.ddi.l

• Codebook: int.ddi.c

• XKOS: int.ddi.xkos

• SDTL: int.ddi.sdtl

• Controlled Vocabularies: int.ddi.cv

• CDI: int.ddi.cdi

ACTION: Wendy will write up and contact Jared and Darren about getting these filed. Product maintenance groups will be informed of the name of the sub-agency as filed.

Update of 2021-2022 TC work plan to cover 2023
​TC-Workplan-2021-22rev2-2023extension

See comments on document

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Oliver

Test RDF-vocabulary:

​Controlled Vocabularies - Overview Table of Latest Versions | Data Documentation Initiative
Production will be https://rdf.ddialliance.org/controlled-vocabularies

Scientific Board extsion of 2021-2022 plan to cover 2023
SB plan extension - send link and identify what can be updated for TC

Draft of URI construction

• Image Added

  16 Nov 2022, 03:54 PM

use of rdf.ddialliance.org/[product]/[version]/

DDI Sub-agencies for products in DDI Agency Registry:

Should each product have a sub-agencies to file

Draft a list and verify the names to match the CV

Lifecycle: int.ddi.life or int.ddi.l

Codebook: int.ddi.code or int.ddi.c

XKOS: int.ddi.xkos

SDTL: int.ddi.sdtl

Controlled Vocabularies: int.ddi.cv

CDI: int.ddi.cdi

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Flavio, Oliver, Geneviève, Johan

Codebook issues from review [comments and notes are listed in Jira issue]

DDICODE-95

DDICODE-96

DDICODE-100

DDCODE-101

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Oliver, Flavio
[Darren provided a contribution via email]

Guidelines for contributions to Lifecycle - how that work with new COGS system and new available options for contribution

Current status of validation rules:

​validate — COGS 1.0 documentation

Validation checks are made. The rules are there due to multiple bindings this checks to make model is valid for each implementation

BACKGROUND:

There are rules for adding modify/adding things in COGS. These are process rules and incorporate the rules defined in the validation system.

The guidelines under discussion are not COGS specific but contributor guidelines specifically for Lifecycle.

Audience would be not only COGS but also consider audience of content working groups. This could be a framework for contribution guidelines for other products, even those not using COGS. They would be useful for content working groups who are defining new content areas which may be incorporated into multiple products.

Guidelines should be provided for all products

TOPIC AREAS:

Identification:

What needs to be identified and what doesn't (easier to integrate across products and retain consistency)

Patterns:

• Patterns - identify important patterns

• Grouping models - provide patterns

  • Use of grouping mechanisms for identified items that may need packaging and later management

• Describable type - name, label, description (describable type) Use of describable as base

Use of common structures:

• Controlled Vocabulary usage

• String structures

Documentation:

• Standard documentation lines - markdown documentation for each item or item type, plus property level

• Rules for content of documentation (should this be added to validation?)

• Property documentation is limited in what is allowed (due to limitations of implementations)

• Item type information is most useful the web documentation but is available in several serialization but generally in plain text

• Guideline to keep it primarily text based - use the article page to provide graphic details

IMPLEMENTATION LANGUAGE SUPPORT:

• Implementation characteristics and variance between implementation languages (leverage results of Implementation Language Workshop)

• Whole notion of packaging - varies by implementation (RDF for example)

WORK PLAN:

• Review the issues we've noted for modeling decisions, organize the guideline issues noted above

• Review tickets regarding development/modeling guidelines - look at how these should work going

• How new options would work. Different groups, new tool for content/product groups

• Might need to go with a number of discussions with people to align with current content and modeling guidelines

Workplan for RDF registry system (CV and XKOS): [submitted via email - Darren]

• wc 24-Oct
  *Final tweaks by Myles/Oliver
  *Send email out to CV WG and DDI Community asking for Feedback

• wc 31 Oct
  Out for feedback and public review

• wc 07-Nov
  Out for feedback and public review

• wc 14-Nov
  Final tweaks and finalise documentation
  Should we have formal TC/SB sign-off?

• wc 21-Nov
  *Launch accompanied by webinar or other comms?
  *Announcement at EDDI

Next Week:

• Organized work plan for guidelines work

• Discussion outline for boundary issues

  • Define what is being discussed and any current issues out of Scientific Board

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Dan, Oliver, Flavio, Genevieve, George

Presentation on registry for Controlled Vocabularies and RDF Implementations

Controlled Vocabularies

• The SKOS output from CESSDA does not have resolvable URLs

• We pull those into bitbucket modify and import into our repository

• CV manager --> Bitbucket repository --> Resolver

ADD to HTML page content:

• Canonical URN
  Canonical URL (RDF)
  Canonical URL (XML)

• If there is a continued need for old format excel files recommendation is to create a transform script that can be used with SKOS file so it can be done only when needed by the user

• Need CV group to provide content for the overview/index page
  Darren will contact

Postman
[displayed content in Postman noting the content coverage for an object]
Example
Concept - missing accept (HTML); HTML, Turtle, RDF+xml, N-Triples, JASON-LD

CV production process:

• Currently manually triggered

• Going into a automated structure - do a periodic dump (can set up as needed)

• Commit based on if there is change

• Reinitializing being triggered by a commit

• CV group would mark as published - the rest would happen automatically

Test Group:

Carsten
Franck
CV group
GESIS group (Oliver will contact)
TC

Inclusion of Disco in registry:
Disco - implementation based on Codebook/Lifecycle model discovery content
Never published
No one has taken ownership and done work on it in the past 5-7 years or more
If it were published it would go in this registry as an RDF product of the DDI Alliance

URL namespaces

• DDI-CDI turtle needs to be delivered through system

• Agency names for products:

• Use of sub agencies for different product agency names

• Look at comparison of liked named objects in terms of differences between specification

Next steps:

• Tune up internal links

• Complete changes as noted above

• Set up the link on agency registry (Dan will check if Tech person can make changes; Darren will contact Jared as administrator of int.ddi.cv)

• Meeting with CV group to get overview/index page

• Contact Franck and Pierre-Antoine regarding namespace

• Testing can begin around the 24th

• Create Documentation - Oliver and Darren (next week start)

• Webinar on CV's and how to use them; XKOS also

Coming soon from Scientific Board

• Review expanded Scientific Plan -

• Add emphasis on high level integration model

• Add technical development platforms

• Consolidate support task for individual product groups and content groups to a single item covering multiple groups

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Flavio, Oliver, Dan, Genevieve,
Regrets: Darren

Implementation Language Meeting

Process:

• Do requirements gathering on Friday

  • could be very broad

• Make sense of this over the weekend - turn into a coherent agenda for Monday and Tuesday

  • Guide for review on the weekend (Wendy and Flavio will look at this...keep general)

  • alignment across models wherever it makes sense

  • review on basis of requirements

  • nothing gets dropped - just tabled for future discussion

  • Talk about that on Monday and Tuesday

• Known topics

  • Priority languages

  • How that could be done in terms of alignment

    • what can be done or can't be done

• Send out to users list next week about the Friday meeting (Jon)

  • Open a document for people to put them in (queries, comments)

  • Send this document to participants

• Get a note on the EDDI web site (Jon)

FUTURE AGENDAS:

COGS was discussed last week

• 13 October

  • Darren - Test platform for XKOS and CV RDF resolution

• Second half of October

  • Boundry issues for TC and production guidelines etc. (second half of October meetings)

  • Contribution guidelines for lifecycle - how that work with new COGS system and new available options for contribution

• Beginning November

  • Codebook review - send out reminder (Wendy)

  • CDI submission to TC

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Oliver, Flavio, Darren, Dan
Apologies: Genevieve

Implementation Language meeting in December 2022

• Friday - 2 rooms so up to 30

• Thursday - TC meeting and people can

• Jon - will check to see on room limitations

• Clarified the role of the Friday meeting and goals of Monday/Tuesday meetings

• Provided criteria for Monday/Tuesday meeting involvement

• Jon will draft a more coherent document to share with CDI

Preparations for Lifecycle 4.0 Beta

• Identified places where documentation needs changing in through COGS - WLT will provide content to Jon, Jon will make changes

• Dan clarified what changes needed to be made in the way DCTerms are handled, name conflict, xml:lang, one or two other minor point. These may not be completed until November - Dan will keep us updated so that outputs can be reviewed

• Wendy will file issues for future discussion on Lifecycle

• Jon will review statis of Topics list and add to agenda in the next few weeks

Codebook

• Review has generated a couple of comments which have been addressed

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Oliver, Dan, Flavio, Genevieve

AGENDA and notes:

Welcome to new member

Genevieve Michaud from SciencesPo has jointed the Technical Committee as of this meeting

Bitbucket access issues

• There seem to be a range of access issues going on in terms of uploading content

• Jon will explore and get back to Wendy on this - others will be contacts if there are still issues

• Provide a brief document on addressing problems that can be posted to help others in future situations

Working Group Relationships

• PDF diagram for comment
  ​TC drafts - Google Drive

• Comment that there needed to be some indication of communications lines particularly between the two sides of the diagram

• working group contact with Scientific Board

• points where there needed to be good communications between specific groups (e.g. TC and Training or Marketing)

Process Papers

Technical paper review
​Review Process for Official Technical Documents

Product process
​Development and Review Processes for DDI Standards and Official Technical Documents

Plan for completion:

• Jon will assist

• Combine the 2 documents

• Add short descriptions of the role of TC, Board, Community

• Add how new areas are identified and working groups creaated (ref SB procedures)

• What happens to work that stops getting worked on or is determined to no longer relevent
  Minimal needed
  --Working groups need to have notes on what they do and when they meeting
  --Google docs should be downloaded and attached for a record of work
  --decisions recorded
  --issues addressed/discussed

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:

• 2023 continuation of Scientific Board Working Plan
  --If there are new areas we are working on be sure to bring up when we get something from the Scientific Board to respond to

• 2024-2025
  --Consider what should go in this (probably will not work on in Scientific Board until spring 2023)

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Darren, Oliver
excused: Flavio

Codebook version 2.6 public review

• package has been posted on review site

• sent preview link to several very active group members (Taina, Darren, Julian, Mehmood)

• last thing to complete is the high level document draft to be completed tomorrow

• Send Jared text for review announcement Friday

• Jared will send out to the usual suspects on Monday, Julian will distribute to additional groups (I'll ask for which lists were used)

Task list from August meeting

ACTION: Wendy

• Finish section on TC August meeting report and request comments and additional detail for follow-up task list as needed

Scientific Board meeting

• The following items are points the TC needs to focus on in the next few months:

  • Approach to cross-DDI relationship

    • conceptual mapping

    • transformation mapping at different levels - CDI has done some research on ways to express this

  • Learning pages

  • Resource page

    • relationship to other standards

  • Getting started page - could use some ideas for re-do

• Scientific workplan schedule

  • Continuing resolution extending 2021-2022 to end of 2023

  • Two year plans starting with 2024-2025 (calendar year)

  • Planning starts in 2023 for the preparation of a workplan to send out to scientific community for comments and approval in June (six months prior to start of plan)

• Process papers on publishing products and official technical papers

  • merge the two documents

  • add process flow diagram

  • Add information on maintenance (how long do you continue to fix bugs on old versions)

  • Creation and maintenance of a product list including all versions
    Include full process: how development projects for a product are dropped, tabled, resurrect, in addition to publishing

  • Include similar process to developing and implementing new or improved content - this could tie into the previously discussed tracking of requirements and tie it into the requirements of creating working groups, tie in the new options for use of COGS

  • Important to get work going on development and publication requirements so we can get it into the document and shape this discussion in the broader SB

  • Goal is to prepare a full process document covering the initiation, development, publication, decision points (start, table, end), and maintenance of products (specifications), technical documents, and expanded coverage topics the the DDI suite of products

• URN and Http resolution - there were suggestions for improving the presentation of instructions and doing marketing and training - they will get back to us with detailed suggestions

ACTION ITEM: (Darren)
Produce a short proposal consolidating URLs and URIs for DDI specifications (XML, RDF, XMI, JSON, C+)

What we currently do:
https://ddialliance.org/Specification/XKOS/1.0/OWL/xkos.html
https://rdf-vocabulary.ddialliance.org/xkos.html

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Flavio

DDI-CDI Bitbucket proposal

Reviewed and have no problems with this. Resulted in a review of current Bitbucket layout and the need to clean up and clarify repository of published packages.

meta project landing page

​DDI Releases

Clean up bitbucket space
have repository of all version packages

DDI Atlassian Member Management

Reviewed draft and confirmed goal of encouraging use of primary tools and management areas for capturing the work of the Alliance. We added a few points on follow-up work, particularly in working with the workshop coordinators to meet current and future needs within licensing constraints

TC meeting follow-up

Discussed set up of a full meeting page with links to workplan, notes, and meeting report. Will contain executive summary and list of tasks generated in meeting.

Meeting Page

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Jeremy, Darren, Flavio

1-Notified TC on the content of the ISI IPS proposal
25 years of DDI working with statistical agencies
Enthusiastic response from invited speakers/agencies

2-Implementation Meeting (around EDDI)
Practical perspective: Jon will talk to Alaina about space
Send outline of meeting to Arofan

3-Codebook: update on preparations
Send to Jared for review announcement
Finish CV and Geography sections of high-level documents

4-Review of workplan for TC August meeting

​Workplan for August 2022 TC Meeting
Ambitious, but nothing missing
Specifics will arise during discussions
Good to bring in the overall process workflows and tooling information

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan, Jon, Darren, Flavio

Implementation Language meeting around EDDI

Funding for Fall meeting on Implementation Languages has been approved. We need to develop a more fully developed outline for this meeting to discuss with CDI later in July.

• Week after would be better due to room availability

• EDDI Right after Thanksgiving (Wednesday-Thursday)

• Hackathon (check with Ingo)

• More generic meeting on the Friday for broader contribution and gory details the next week (3 days?)

• Identify specific implementations

• What needs to be done in a consistent manner

• What can be flexible

• Explanation of usage needed

Codebook 2.6 review

• wlt provide Jon with link - upload

COGS

No Jon next two weeks - no actions on COGS until then

August meeting of TC in Minneapolis

Funding has been approved

Specific goals and outputs from August meeting:

--Document changes in structure
--XML, RDF, JSON, UML/XMI (canonical), Sphinx and restructured text documentation
--Rules and output where possible - reconciling between the schema and outputs
--when we cut the cord that we are able to get back to the 3.3 schema
--What the different serializations look like - just doing vanilla transformations are a bit pointless
--Technical review - can roll out serializations separately
--XML and JSON are currently the most used and most stable and are probably ready first for review
--RDF and UML/XMI has been tested by EA
--If we wanted canonical XMI we have to change output or use the translation tool used by CDI
--Build in canonical XMI as an output (currently has 2 - Normative 2.4.2, 2.5 with diagram and diagram exchange) new flavor would be canonical
--Discussion of TC future leadership and roles
--Change log of XML structure between 3.3 and 3.4 to see what changed and why (supporting multiple serializations)
--Talking about changes - tree hierarchy is still the same but there are other things that are being updated to XML centric (CHOICE models) - substitution groups, removing a few things that are remnants of 3.0 and 3.1 (Identification and Reference properties)

CANCEL Next two meetings - June 30, July 7

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan S., Flavio, Darren
AGENDA:
--Respond to SB comments on Review Process for Official Technical Documents
Document was revised in response to comments from the Scientific Board and Franck Cotton
Recommended that this document be integrated into the Process Document for standards publication. Hilde and Ingo will be notified of update

--ID and Reference for COGS ​DDILIFE-3703: Review of properties from ReferenceType for use in 4.0OPEN
Some things have been injected during serialization. Should these be flagged in some way rather than have them just in code
The model definition itself doesn't need any knowledge so perhaps in the settings area rather than just in the code. Clearly shouldn't be in the model
This would be useful for documentation at the serialization level.
See issue Number DDILIFE 3703

--Publication process for CDI - new date is mid-July
--submission
--parts delivered
--difference on contents to determine if additional review is needed
--clear statement of what members are voting on as this is a new product for the DDI suite
Place on future agenda - Please think about this so we can move through the process expeditiously

--DDI Codebook comparison to other products - work done by SND - how to integrate this into DDI work on comparison ​SSHOC DDI Codebook Metadata Crosswalk
Place on future agenda

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Oliver, Dan S

Updated on CDI status, Codebook review status, COGS input corrections, and LOD work at UKDA
Discussed August in-person meeting including increase in air fares and goals for the meeting

• Focus is on output of COGS

• Produce implementations that can be used for a broad technical review of new XML structures and new implementations - this is a technical review of the viability of these new structures and identifying issues that should be addressed.

• Discussion of TC direction over the next few years - new members, leadership changes, strategic directions

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Flavio, Darren

In person meeting

If funded by Exec Committee the TC In person meeting in Minneapolis at ISDRI has been approved for August 1-5, 2022. A note has been sent to TC members confirming the dates.

Presentation at Members Meeting and Scientific Board

The Members meeting presentation is only 3-5 minutes in length. Focus will be on funded activities and Codebook work. Will get a short statement from Darren so that this work presented accurately. Next year focus of coordinating multiple implementations of products and progressing on the production platform.

COGS decisions regarding Identification and Representation properties, use of citation

• Reviewed issues and had a brief discussion of properties

• Wendy will create Jira issues (relate to gitHub issues) so that a full discussion is recorded and retrained within the design issues discussed in TC. (GitHub is specific to the COGS implementation and this should reflect both the issue and decision). Google documents will be used to focus discussion and linked from the Jira issue (these will be downloaded as documents and attached when issue is decided).

• Members will be asked to review and comment

• COGS input issues (xml to csv) will be addressed as follows:

  • Modify transformation program where easy to do (new columns on csv with default values where information is not available in xml, etc.)

  • Export resulting csv files, edit, and reload - this is a one time import and the issues are primarily due to inconsistencies in the xml

  • Focus on import transformations should be on scripts that will be reused (example: import of canonical xmi from CDI to create a COGS copy)

  • XML will be modified for addition of managed representations for those few not currently available and inclusion of other physical data product content using name modifications for elements with same name in different namespaces. The intent is to support the shift to serialization and use of inclusion by reference and to provide all the record layout options for review without massive remodeling.

  • Handful of complex choice nesting locations will be mildly remodeled and documented in csv files.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Oliver, Dan S.

Annual Report

No additional comments, will leave available through Sunday and then send in

Codebook

• Field level documentation HTML version has been completed

• Wendy will review Change Log and update, set up review page and create the google page for the high level documentation draft

• Review should start by end of May. This should last to the middle or end of August

• Anticipate easy review because there has been a lot of consultation - this should mean that developers can begin work using the Review version we some certainty

COGS work

Reference:

• Reference properties outside of the identification is the issue

• Reference is an entity and will act differently with serialization - RDF is a URI, XML / JSON model

• Review specifics of properties - Wendy will document

  • Example: Where you need to know a context of what you are referencing add another reference for context.

  • Including extra properties

• Option is to create Complex types

  • Reference becomes an element in the complex

  • Where is such extended content needed

Identifiers:

• don't think there is any difficulty by serialization. Some have their own identification (URI in RDF)

• Drop the difference between Versionable and Maintainable. There is only one way to identify an item (URN, AGENCY, ID, VERSION)

• Additional properties

  • Describable class extension of versionable

  • Properties found in versionable - review

• Identification is injected during creation of serializations

  • Inject identfication into any item type will have identification

  • Complex data types DON'T get Identification

• Another area of confusion for additional properties is the use of Name/Type/Description and Citation (currently used singularly or together in some elements)

  • Look at where citation is used and how. OtherMaterialTypes (clean-up later) Group? StudyUnit? ResourcePackage, Instance, etc.

CHOICE issues are being sorted

PhysicalDataProduct

• Add NCubeInstance to the basic RecordLayout now in the main schema

• Make the others derivatives of the BaseRecordLayoutType with unique element names and move the content to PhysicalDataProduct

• This will get everything in AND let us use one PhysicalDataProduct to import

Representations

• Recreate the few representation types that are not in the ManagedRepresentations.

• This gives them the same structure and we can determine later if we want to continue this division between representations that have references to other objects or what.

CV and RDF resolver:
The sandbox will be set up end of next week

https://rdf-vocabulary.ddialliance.org/cv
e.g. https://rdftest-vocabulary.ddialliance.org/cv/ModeOfCollection/1.0.1

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Oliver

CV work

• UKDS are finalising server setup next week.

• Oliver & Darren working together to get content in once it is setup. Target by the end of May.

• DNS needs to be setup at ICPSR.

DDItoCogs issues from Virtual Meeting

• Physical Structures (when to do remodel - couple of options for testing COGS input)

• Representations (when to do the remodel from mix of in-line and reference)

• Reference structures

• Identification

Standing on the Agenda

• TC will still have a shorter separate presentation (WG updates will be summarized by SB chairs)

Report for the Scientific Board Meeting

• Written report to the meeting

• Draft has been started - Wendy will complete and circulate

Date for F2F Technical Meeting

• Canvass for dates – August 2022

Codebook Review

• Field Level Documentation – Jon to do

• Documentation will be description of  changes

• Full High Level documentation to follow

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Darren, Dan S.

Update on CDI
--CDI is planning to get the package to the TC on June 1st. They realize we won't be able to deal with it until after IASSIST, but given the history of delays over the years, this lets them put a "win" in their column by getting it passed on.

Virtual Meeting:

• Updated the page with correct dates and links to the relevant issues in TC

• 9-11 CDT M-F plan on meetings. These may not be used but keep the slot free

Topics to discuss:

• Review where we are at with the input transformation

• Complex choice - status and how to redesign where need - chat first thing and then what we need to discuss later

Substitution Groups:

• Chose specific substitutions to use and how to implement

• XML substitution groups - is there stuff we want to merge or can we remodel that

• There is no model for the DCterms terms, these have been replaced by primitive types

Reference

• Design rules (managed references rather than modeled)

• Things that derived from Reference need to be added in other ways

• Handling additional reference information in terms of the overall model as it has to deal with multiple serialization targets

• References - is there some content that we need to retain that is not there

Rational to document:

• This will simplify the structure for everyone - in the future

• Draft of what was changed

• References were converted from a type to an auto-generated

Organization:

Monday

• Discussion on above

• Sort out who is doing what and when we get back together to discuss each point

• COGS validation process - what can be done intentionally and what needs to be done

Tuesday

• Discussion about what we are trying to do with the UML XMI input and output

• Realistically can the CDI model be collapsed into a COGS model

Thursday

• Can we have some consistency in the UML-XMI expressed by the canonical XMI

• What are the realistic possibilities of having a COGS maintenance pipeline for CDI

• Prioritization of outputs from COGS

Actions:

• Wendy will draft content on changes in the DDI Agency Registry for the DDI Alliance page, have Dan S. review it, post, and add information to the Scientific Board URN document

• Jon will add information from today’s meeting on the Virtual Meeting page including a draft meeting schedule

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Flavio, Darren

Funding requests

• Draft of the joint sponsored meeting on implementation languages sent to Arofan for CDI input

• TC meeting is just an update of last years with an adjustment of goals and outcomes

Codebook 2.6

• Finalize specification (header update) and make available to Darren (for CESSDA work)

• Complete draft of high level documentation by EOM

• Get out for public review as soon as possible in May

• Publicizing DDI Agency Registry work

• Draft content for web site in easy to understand words regarding capabilities and options

TC priorities for next year:

• Implementation languages - do not mean to hold up work of specific groups but want them to be aware of the work so we don't design ourselves into corners or have decisions driven by single products

• 2.6 completion and publication

• Requirements management

• Production framework

• Mapping within DDI Suite - translation work

• Explore options for Codebook in terms of design rules (what needs to be backward compatible)

• Syntax representations issues - maybe put new ones out is a beta-like mode for testing and identification of problem points - both Lifecycle and CDI plan RDF representations in the first half of fiscal year

No meeting

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Oliver, Darren, Flavio

DDI Agency Registry publication/announcement

• Sent email to Dan and Barry regarding this

• Would like to complete in the next 3 weeks

Identifying technical contacts in DDI

Notes from Jared's email
Next steps:

• At its next meeting, the Scientific Board will review and finalize the draft definitions of Scientific Representative and Technical Contact

  • note: from SB transition working group-content for Technical Contact was originally written by TC

• Jared will contact the member representatives requesting names for Scientific Representative and Technical Contacts. Both are optional.

• We still need to figure out the optimal way of sharing those names.

Preparing for May Virtual meeting - what we need to complete in April
SEE: ​TC Virtual Work Meeting - 2-6 May 2022
(linked from TC page upper left box of current activities)

Items below were noted today and are on the page

• UML/XMI review of what needs to be capture

• Updates to the ingest program of known easy to fix problems

• Outline the discussion issues around complex choices

• Identification/Reference details

DDI Alliance resolution system for CVs and RDF vocabularies
​DDI Controlled Vocabulary for Aggregation Method

• Darren talked to Miles and he feels its very straight forward beginning work on infrastructure the week of the 11th of April.

• The software PUBBY they were going to use is quite old - wouldn't really need if we use the CESSDA generated HTML
  ​https://github.com/cygri/pubby/tree/master/src/mainConnect your Github account

• Do we need a user interface for this - for general publication of CVs
  This can be done with html, skos, and codeList
  What would the user see if they followed a link. They would get the RDF or JSON structure. But the SKOS could contain the link to the html
  HTML as a mime type could redirect to the visual page

• The transforms occur in a bitbucket pipeline using XSL transform. This would run with free of charge run time (say once a month)
  ​Technical Design Specification
  Added link from TC page CURRENT ACTIVITIES box and from the original Resolution for DDI-CVs and RDF vocabularies

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan S., Flavio, Oliver, Johan, Daren

Agenda Items:

• Worked on Funding requests preparing them one for discussion with CDI (this was recorded as changes in the draft documents found in TC Draft shared google folder.

• Did a final review of the recommendations for technical document review. This can be sent to Ingo and Hilde for discussion in SB

• Members were asked to look at DDICODE-85 regarding a new Codebook Tree document and add comments as needed.

Discussion of the Recommendation for Review of Technical Documents brought up some broader issues noted below. Some of these are broader than the purview of TC so they will be raised in SB or EB as appropriate.

• Discussion of types of documentation, technical interoperability, semantic comparability, use case focus

• Organizing information can be difficult to meet the needs of different people

• Need to be clearer about what can be found where

• Technical interoperability

• Semantic interoperability

• Clearer publication of what is covered and perspective - on product page

• How to describe the decision making approach in using different features (CVs, Variable Cascade, etc.)

• What is the line between "official" publications of a product and what are supplementary materials (like the training materials)

• Guidance documents by users of DDI

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan S., Flavio, Oliver

Reviewed current work plan through December 2022

• CV work - Oliver has been working on translation of output. Needs additional permissions at CESSDA.

• Identified focus for July-Dec 2022

• Identified activities requiring funding

May virtual meeting on COGS work:

Outstanding issues:

• Substitution Groups - Physical

• Complex choice - dealing with inheritance hierarchy, comprehensive modeling of current information

• Consistent modeling across model -

What can we do pre-meeting

• Listing of things that were skipped or changed

Documents recently discussed in TC draft google folder:

• WorkPlan for July Dec 2022

• Review Process for Official Technical Documents

• Integrated production framework

• Requirements and Process Management

• TC Work Plan 2021-22

No meeting

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Larry, Oliver, Dan S., Darren, Johan

CV documentation in codebook
CV group has requested that there be a link from within the schema to the specific CV
This means how we change for mid-release CV updates
DECISION: There will be a URI to the latest version that's what would go into the documentation
We can update only doing a minor update.
If documentation of new versions of Lifecycle are being generated we can easily integrated into the field level documentation
Is the SKOS a near thing in terms of exporting the SKOS we need to process. Oliver needs to look at it.

DOI's for Best Practices and High Level Documentation
Would prefer DOIs to on the HTML version of the Best Practices, or High Level Documents

Citing a standard you reference the specific home page URL
​Library Guides: APA 7th Referencing: Standards & Patents cite standard number and publisher
Issue is do we want to maintain the versioning or take snapshots and deposit it ZENODO
Either we manage the versioning locally or we have to do the snapshot and copy to ZENODO

Step this back to the question of what is the need for a separate DOI for these official publications related to a product. We need a clearer sense of the use case for this as well as the broader need. Doing DOIs requires that we managing versioning more than an internal log of update changes within the document.

If we can't cite a document without a DOI then we need a DOI. File and management persistent identifier versioning situation

ACTION:
Raise a TC ticket and write down what we understand to be the problem
One point about persistence if we make changes in reorganization of our website we need to recognize the problem of breaking links.

Nail down what needs to be done for the documentation of the changes to the DDI Agency Registry both on the site and on the DDI Alliance page, then the announcement.
Mixture of a user guide and best practices document. Item for the Virtual TC - spend about an hour on the agenda. Coordinate with the SB URN working group

CANCEL Meeting on 10th March

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Larry, Oliver, Dan S., Darren, Johan, Carsten (2nd half for URN discussion)

Codebook:

Reviewed changes to agent types, conceptualTextTypes and concepts - spreadsheet should be implemented as listed

Enter these as a set for review, then enter documentation changes to 68 items. Note that 5 items need examples.

Mapping:

Johan - Project Shoc (social sciences and humanities open cloud) to create mapping to other standards and policies for conversion. There is a month and a half to the end of the project. Present to work to TC next week. Contact Flavio who will not be able to attend.

Recommendations part:

• The first choice - is that registering every URN that is created?

• Resolving DNS service are just for service resolution an end-point in a port (has been there for a long time)

• HTTP service end-points (3 built in web resolution, DDI which is the individual, and set with all related URNs)

• No differentiation between global and internal

Carsten:
What services should be operated to support URN resolution
What should be provided by the DDI Alliance
What should be provided by the member agencies

Diagram of URN resolution works (diagram in the SB WG paper)
Need to clarify what is already available
Once you know a URN belongs to DDI you can query DDI Agency Registry

If there is an established resolver used by agency
A service record is only providing an end-point (service and port)
There is nothing saying what type of service is being provided

You'd have to know the common name for the web/URN/verbatim service record and could use the DNS records to look up where those resolves are
Looking of service look-ups is not well supported across the board like by web services

How to come from DDI to the actual object
"N to T" arch id, handles, etc. at California Digital Libraries

This can do "N to T"
Have to know what the
No common resolution but there is a way of figuring out who owns the URN space and linking to the ​Home Page - DDI Agency Registry
There is a common system https://registry.ddialiance.org
You need to know the syntax of the DDI URN to proceed to go from ARPA to DDI (the registration in ARPA does that)
Don't want implementers to use that API to resolve everything, but to use that as a means of structuring local tool so that
A load limitation precludes having this available for handling all queries
So what's missing?
Identifier resolution and identifier end point. Individual identifiers can be resolved in terms of a consistent pattern within an agency or sub-agency. Individual variations from the pattern are not supported.
Published content owned by the DDI Alliance (primarily CV's and RDF vocabularies) - Darren and Oliver are completing that

General Discussion

• Access to the objects is in the court of the Agency

• In the recommendation (1) suggesting that the Alliance would register individual URNs (long paper)?
  If a DDI URN is found in the wild the DDI Alliance can direct you to where it is found
  That you can get a formal description of service

• Individual URNs were not considered an option

• There is a template approach (end-point at an agency level) they can provide additional breakdown at the initial endpoint (for example based on knowledge of internal structures)

• What the current service does not provide is validation of agency assigned IDs. It is their responsibility to state it is not a valid URN. Even with handle service you have to keep up-to-date with directions

• Use case not covered - is the Alliance taking on what is actually the agencies responsibility. The ​Home Page - DDI Agency Registry is simply a passthrough.

• Is it clear to the agency that this is what they'd have to do.

• What about a scenario where someone registers an agency and then deposits it in an archive.

• They'd keep their same agency ID and can define their own resolution. You could put the archive as the service for their agency. The resolution service would have to direct it to a differential agencies.

• Best Practice around this? If it is a distributed resolution environment and an agency has deposited in several different archives. They need a resolution system to address that.

• TC is open to further discussions with Carsten or with the URN Working Group as needed.

Background Information:

Carsten's email:
My understanding when taking on the lead of the URN TWG of the SB was that only the first step, Consumer<->DNS was working.
I understood our mission to clarify which of the other exchanges in the diagram needed to be implemented by either the Alliance or an Agency.
This is what our discussions on centralised vs decentralised solutions were mostly about.

From Dan's slides from EDDI (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5747652) I understood as follows:
Slide 8 says that the second step consumer<->registry for SRV records has been available for some time, but I don't know how it works and can't seem to find the documentation.
Slide 11-1&2 allowed me to do the third step consumer<->registry/Agency for the URL of a concrete URN, but Slide 11-3 did only allow me to retrieve the pattern via API, not the specific answer for a given URN.
The final step consumer<->repository is beyond the scope of the URN service.

Did I understand this correctly and where can I find a full documentation of steps two and three to follow end to end?
If I understand correctly, there is no mechanism foreseen to decide whether any URN is valid by the registry, but it would always return a URL that the repository then can't answer. (see screenshot)
I am happy to discuss this also tomorrow afternoon and please do forward this mail to those whom it concerns.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Larry, Dan S., Oliver, Flavio, Darren

XKOS best practices:

• XKOS will have an invited technical review starting Feb 25, followed by a public review for comprehension lasting 6-8 weeks

• Publication will have a DOI (working with Jared on process)

• Wendy will draft a Guidelines for officially published documents (Best Practices, high level documentation) for submission to the Scientific Board for comment. This will be based on the XKOS process as the first document published under this process.

Codebook:

DDICODE-83 and general policy for use of conceptTextType

• Result of this is that ProcStat will not change as the only real use is internal processing information and those with processing systems have not requested this. There are no broader standards.

• Other items in document were approved.

The cutoff for deciding if an element should change from a simpleTextType to a conceptualtextType:

• If there is a standardized list it should be conceptualTextType

• If it is ONLY for processing (internal information) is probably overload

DDI Agency Registry:

• Link to presentation now available. Contact Barry about marketing announcement. Dan S. will work on working with Barry.

• Wendy will get these new capabilities into the URN Working Group paper to make sure they are complete

• Wendy will review directions in Administration section of DDI Agency Registry and write up an information page for the the Agency Registry page on the DDI site. Content will be sent to Dan for review when ready.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Oliver, Flavio, Larry, Darren, Dan S.

Update on Codebook activities:

• Review of field level documentation has identified one or two additional needed changes (for consistency). These will be grouped and entered for review as a set.

• Updated work on high level documentation - addition of a "tree" representation of Codebook

Follow-up on TC review of URN Working Group paper:

• Timing of review by TC will be discussed in next URN WG meeting

• Wendy will update the URN paper with examples from Colectica Presentation
  DDI Registry presentation by Dan 10.5281/zenodo.5747653
  ​DDI Agency Registry Upgrades

CV LOD system

• SKOS recommendation

• There are also documents on the Atlassian site. These will be merged and TC members informed that it is ready for review and comments

• Versioning approach is being worked out and entered

• Transform of existing SKOS into a cleaner SKOS (Oliver)

• Publish transforms into bitbucket and then those will be grabbed and posted to the cloud

• 2nd week in march is slated for setup of the cloud platform

• New CV tools also have been proposed to be deployed in March

• Oliver has been in contact with CESSDA so that he is aware of where to do tweeks in URIs
  to deal with identifiers for codes

COGS

After the virtual meeting regarding COGS input we will be focusing on COGS output with a goal of identifying where similarity in formats for XML, RDF, JSON-LD, other formats is useful between products and where differences are needed to support specific applications. Planning needs to start for funding and scientific plan in conjunction with the groups developing products. For example, Pierre Antoin has a relationship with Scientific Board in terms of development of RDF JSON-LD for DDI-CDI and RDF in general.

This discussion is broader than TC and work has been done in each of the products with one or more formats that needs to be considered:

• DDI-L - XML (moving to full serialization), plans for RDF, JSON-LD, UML, etc.

• DDI-C - XML (hierarchical structure)

• XKOS - RDF (SKOS extension)

• SDTL - JSON

• Controlled Vocabularies - RDF (SKOS), XML (Codelist)

• DDI-CDI - XML (serialized), plans for RDF

Google groups and role of SRG list

• Update on Google Groups and continuation of the role of the SRG list to serve as a means of keeping interested people in touch with development discussions.

• Dan had question on specific feature of set up regarding prefixes. He will contact Jared directly

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Oliver, Larry, Flavio, Dan S., Barry

Codebook -

• Language by element repetition

• pull-requests merged

• Content and review of high level documentation - use review to edit draft

LOD Infrastructure

• Met with staff and what do with the URI's released by the CESSDA service

• CESSDA is doing a relaunch in March with minor changes which would cover all the system changes we needed for URI scheme

• Bitbucket repository will be set up soon so Oliver can pass over the scripts for production

• We may not need an extra transformation for target SKOS

• 2 major fixes are URI's to be really resolvable and not deliver empty descriptions for catagories if they don't occur in different languages

• URIs are generated with CESSDA output and we would be able to define the URIs produced

• Categories would have a consistent technical identifier rather than a clear text identifier

• SKOS to Codelist - Oliver will see if Darren has done any work on this, if not he will do this within the next week or so

Virtual Meeting

• April meeting - Dan and Jeremy busy the week of the 4th (6-11 unavailable)

• XMI/CDI:

  • Cardinality of both source and target

  • Relationship types - aggregations, compositions may not be relevant

  • Uses and dependencies (patterns)

  • Types are in the names now

  • Achim has done drafts of description of UML that can be used for this style of modeling

  • We would want options for getting this into COGS

  • Review of CDI XMI and of Achim's draft - Flavio and Larry

• Nail down dates as soon as possible so we can get some time frames for pre-meeting work

• The mix of data and metadata is important - JSON is a good vehicle

XKOS Best Practice Review

• Process (review of process itself)

• DOI application - multiple DOI's? ex. INSEE

Scientific Board WG on URN -

• Beneficial to make sure it addresses what is currently available and what is still needed

• It can resolve you to an individual URN - they can define a range of services

• Content hosting is not supported - URN resolution is solved

• TC should provide feedback on the draft of the document as this is the group that has been working on it for the past decade

• There are a lot of resolution options already available and we'd like to make sure they are focusing on new

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Dan S., Larry, Johan, Darren, Flavio

CV work
Discussion of low level specifics took place this week. Oliver expects transformations complete in a few weeks and Darren should complete some of his work. Something testable by end of February. CESSDA SKOS compliance probably not until end of year. We are not dependent upon CESSDA compliance to complete our work.

CODEBOOK

• Get a 2.6 out for review

• Work on weighting is not ready yet and should not hold up 2.6 given the need for DataVerse related. Better to get it correct than to put it in not quite finished. Backward compatibility rule. Don't hold but encourage movement on the sections that have been dropped (SDI and NCube).

• DDICODE-39 is another one to hold for further work. Note these issues in the release for review information for 2.6 and add a label post2.6 to these issues.

• Larry is looking into DDICODE-39 to see if there is a clear and unambiguous solution that could go into 2.6. If not it will be worked on for 2.7

• Set up high level document site for Codebook with Jon.

CDI is still finalizing documentation and will get to use dependent upon peoples work availability.

ADDITIONAL ISSUES we need to organize for discussion:

• XML is currently expressed in different styles between Codebook, Lifecycle, and CDI

  • what are the implications?

  • Are there overall rules that can be carried across the broader set of products and not just designed along a single one

• RDF usage is currently in SDTL and XKOS

  • These have their own RDF schemas and SDTL is integrated in PROV-1 and XKOS is integrated with SKOS as it is an extension

• Implementation languages for representations

Discuss when work plans need to be in for SB and how this coordinates with the financial requests.

NEXT WEEK NO TC due to Scientific Community Meeting

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Larry, Oliver, Dan S., Darren, Flavio, Johan

Requirements and Process Management - Integrated production framework and platform
​Requirements and Process Management

• Good idea to have a sense of an integrated platform

• Infrastructure documentation - designing a standard SDLT

• We need to have a person who will oversee the design and implementation of the infrastructure

• Inventory of the existing buckets

• There shouldn't be any piece of production process or work we do that isn't in a public space

• Shouldn't rely on code or procedures that are in someone's head rather than in some published location

• We don't want systems reliant on an individual

• Availability of platform, both software and hardware, (needing to run on individual computers and requiring set up - example documentation set up for field level documentation)

• Initial discovery exercise - spreadsheet Wendy set up

• Look additionally at options

• If we need additional cloud space we will need to request beginning in the new fiscal year

• FFair(?) is set up to rebuild documentation each time a change is made

• Identify what is used by each product

• When you use free tools is everything exportable? yes, it just runs a rebuild script in an conformable environment with multiple platforms
  https://ci.appveyor.com/project/ddibot/ddimodel

• Darren will take a first stab

• CDI
  Jan 19 would be earliest but they are still working on the documentation so will probably be a bit later

Codebook
Will be scheduled for next week to see finalization for review

CV work

• Progress has been made and Oliver and Darren will meet next week

• Versioning at CESSDA is getting clearer (meeting on Monday)

• Profile of SKOS structure

​Technical Design Specification | Metadata Profile (CVS<>RDF<>DDI L)

Requirements and Implementation Management
Needs additional work - need to determine how to go about this

DDI Agency Registry update work
Acknowledged that Colectica has completed the work on the DDI Agency Registry update and presented on the work at EDDI. Announcement will be made when video of the presentation is published so that it can be referenced in the announcement.

ATTENDEES: Wendy, Jon, Dan S., Oliver, Larry, Barry

Review of Work Plan:

XKOS:

• Talk to Franck and settle on a process

• Light way would be to do it to the list - set up a comments process

• Comments period for Best Practices

• Meet XKOS needs and outline a basic approach to formal Best Practice papers

COGS Virtual meeting

• Jon will drive meeting

• Correct the input issues we know about

• Focus on input accuracy, support for output needs in XMI, input of XMI as well as current XML content, sorting through entry issues and complex nesting

• Easter is a problem week before or after 17th April (Oliver is available)

• Oliver may have some problems with the week of April 25

• Google docs for document working

• BitBucket features - due dates comments

• Slack possible but may not work for all

• Task and process assignments

• Who we want and what we want to get done, set up agenda early so we can nail it down early

Mapping Work:

• Mapping and comparison is progressing and is also being discussed in the Scientific Board - we need to coordinate

• Caution: we need to be clear on what is the mapping for?

  • Conceptual down to transformation

  • Managing ownership

Additional Notes:

• EDDI videos will be coming out in the next few weeks as they come in - Jon will talk to Jared and probably post by track

• Follow up with Jared and Exec on the period of the fiscal year given shift in work plan year to January/December (this year’s work plan goes through December 2022)